Homeschool News & Views
February 23, 2007
from Homeschool
Helpers,
in association
with Pass It On Ministries
Greetings. This
is Dan White with Homeschool
Helpers, and issue number 11 of Homeschool News & Views.
Utah
A great propaganda blitz
over many decades has convinced most Americans that
Look at these quick excerpts from the
recent news.
In
Connecticut Gov. M. Jodi Rell's historic
proposal to
bolster state spending on education by more than $1 billion a year is a
good
start - but not good enough, a coalition of municipal and education
officials
said. In
In all those cases the premise is that
government schools need more tax dollars to make them better. More blood does not make a cancer
better. More blood makes a cancer
bigger. Giving more money to the
public schools does not solve the education
problem, because the public schools are the education problem.
A study on the web site
heartheissues.com shows that public school
spending and public school achievement do not correlate.
Whoops.
Analyzing
the data further, the top half of the
states with the highest per pupil spending had a passing rate of 73.55%. The half with the lowest spending had a
passing rate of 73.32%.
Six
states did not report passing rates for the No
Child Left Behind Act, while forty four
states
did. Breaking those states down into four
equal groups shows that the highest spending quartile had a passing
rate of
72%; the second highest quartile had a passing rate of 75%; the third
highest
spending quartile had a passing rate of 78%; and the lowest had a
passing rate
of 70%.
There is no correlation
between amount
of money spent on the public schools and the learning achieved.
The
same is true of teacher salaries.
Why
don’t we hear that on the news? Something
like a shocking expose – “More money
does not buy better public schools!”
Isn’t it incredible that almost everyone
is convinced that the public schools are bad, that the reason they are
bad is
because they don’t get enough money, and the more money they get the
better they
will be?
Only one part of that three part
statement
is true. The public schools are bad.
In
any normal business, the worse you do, the
less money you get.
In public education, the worse
they do, the more money they
get. You did notice in those stats the huge
number of public school students who are failing the basic standards,
didn't you? In New Jersey, with the highest teacher salaries, 46%
of its students failed. In Alaska, with the highest
per pupil spending, 41% failed. Wow! Why don't we get the
government to do something about that!
So
The
teachers union says that tax dollars
should not be spend at private schools.
They say that tax dollars should be spent with them. One
Democrat said that the law had nothing to do
with educating children, only with giving tax dollars to a private
industry.
What
industry?
Private
schools where the teachers get less, do
more and turn out a superior product? Right
now the tax dollars go to an ever expanding government monopoly.
The order of spending is public schools,
private schools and home
schools. The order of achievement is home
schools, private schools and public schools.
What is shocking about that Democrat's statement, about giving tax
dollars to a private industry? You see, he is automatically
assuming that a lot of people are going to be leaving his schools!
The liberals are not
interested in getting the best education for
The left wing
organization People for the
“This is a sad
day for
But should
we be interested in helping the education system, or should we be
interested in
helping educate our children?
The government
education system has shown long ago that it does not help the children. It helps the left wing maintain control on
the minds of the children.
The PFAW statement went on, “Children
will not benefit from this program. Vouchers have always been about
ideology
and not education. We’ve never seen a shred of credible evidence that
shows
school vouchers actually help students learn.”
They have never
seen credible
evidence that shows a non-public education actually helps students
learn. What would they define as credible
evidence? Only that evidence which
agrees with them. Anything which does
not support them is not credible. In
making this statement they tacitly admit that there is evidence that
non-public
education is superior. They just don’t
accept it as being credible.
They say that
vouchers are about
ideology and not about education.
Therefore it has to be true that their education system is about
ideology, too. They are promoting an
ideology which many people want to get away from.
The People for the
What in the world
does getting an
excellent education have to do with the public schools? Nothing. That’s like saying that every child deserves
an excellent home, and then requiring all children to live in public
housing
projects. Welfare housing and excellent
living do not go together. Welfare
education and excellent education do not go together.
That’s why the well-to-do left wing liberals,
who vociferously support the public schools, almost never send their
own
children to those schools.
The
There is no
explicit provision for homeschooling in this
law. Laws are technical, and the way
a
law is put into practice is often different than was envisioned, as
people find
ways to work with the literal reading of the law.
It may well be that homeschoolers may be
able to organize in such a way as to qualify for tuition assistance. Or homeschoolers may be able to work with a
private school, sharing some classes and activities while still
homeschooling
for the most part. I know of parents who
have done that with a Christian school we worked with, not for money
but just
because they wanted to do it that way.
A voucher law
was put to a referendum in
That is
certainly true.
Some locales
already forbid foster parents from teaching the
children placed in their care that sodomy is wrong.
A foster parent in those locales cannot freely read the Bible to
the children in his care. If the present anti-Christian trend
continues, it is only a question of time before all parents are
forbidden to
teach their children that sodomy is wrong.
It is absurd and absolutely immoral for Christians to support
this
anti-Christian education system in any way whatsoever.
A program, such as the
Will this
voucher program help homeschooling or hinder it?
A great
problem with
It might be that
a voucher program will hinder
homeschooling. If homeschool parents
cannot receive tuition assistance, and private school parents can, some
may
decide not to homeschool for that reason, choosing a private school
instead.